Reduce overwhelm by applying clear entry rules: minimum reliability, acceptable footprint, compatible filters, and a price ceiling. Limit the shortlist to three to five candidates so trade-offs stay visible. Missing out feels uncomfortable, yet gained clarity usually beats fear of better possibilities lurking just off-screen.
Use simple normalization to compare unlike attributes. Convert annual energy cost to a per-cup figure, scale taste using blind side-by-side tests, and map cleanup time to minutes. Min–max scaling or z-scores both work. Document assumptions transparently so future you can revisit decisions without reinventing the analysis.
Multiply weights by scores, sum totals, then pause for a sanity check. If a tiny tweak flips the winner, consider a tie-breaker test or redefine criteria. Ask, “Does the result feel plausible?” Decide deliberately, schedule a review date, and enjoy coffee that matches your actual priorities.